In Part 2 of our review of Matt Walsh’s videos against the Biblical view of a Young Earth Creation, Pastors Mark Tiefel and Nathanael Mayhew discuss a few additional issues. Why would Matt Walsh single out Ken Ham and not the other scientists on the Answers in Genesis team? First, Ken is probably the most familiar, and while he doesn’t have a scientific PhD, he has many people working with him who do. Leaders in the fields of biology, astronomy, geology and more work side by side with Ken Ham and also accept the historical record of Genesis 1. Matt Walsh is also inconsistent when he says that he is not insisting on his own view, but then says that Ken Ham, and all other young earth creationists, are wrong. They also dig into Matt Walsh’s view that Genesis is “metaphorical and theological,” and the theological problems you have if you take it in a metaphorical way. There is only one interpretation of any verse, and that is God’s intended interpretation. Join us for a journey through Biblical interpretation and defending the truth of God’s inspired Word!
See Matt Walsh’s first video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IG8JihEKrUI
See Matt Walsh’s second video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ0AxTx1kZY
See Answers in Genesis’ rebuttal here: https://youtu.be/v08w_P9EIaw